12/8/2022 0 Comments Zwcad wineBricscad seems to be a good native replacement. I have already came back from places you wish me to go. But first we should be on the same page, when we discuss something. In any case, we will need more information on the specific problems to be able to help with them, if you're willing to work towards solving them. Once Libreoffice was able to open/save DOC(X) files it became more popular. Not anything else than MS Office and OpenOffice/Libreoffice. If you work independently (which almost impossible) you may use FreeCAD. Solving that issue will bring it to another level. Now I clearly see - you are trolling me.įreecad has a huge problem. They're not something that work together.Īah. Posted: Fri 10:57 am Post subject: > 6.17. If there would be Linux based CAD, than all that nightmare won't happen. Windows VM based solution works, but that is too slow for any reasonable CAD Obviously I cannot check all the Wine versions and not all kind of binary versions What is the reason for that? What is different there? Why the same config cannot I saw on that forum, that some suggest to use Wine from Fedora or other Distros. Posted: Fri 7:45 am Post subject: Re: Is Wine dead? Real Windows, which I am not really willing to use. I have tried ReactOS inside of VM, but that is also NOGO solution. I read in that forum about some tricks how to make this or that, but have not found I have also built wine from sources myself. Please, don't consider I blame Portage for that issue. wow.Īny one is aware of really working wine version something like wine 5 or earlierĪnd are there step by step procedure to make it functional? Is it possible at all?Īlso may be some one knows about mandatory USE flags to make it work?įor example I don't need any sound support for wine, therefore it all has beenĭisabled in my case, but because of some miracle wine might not work w/o alsa or gstreamĪnyway at present wine itself is on garbage level of functionality. Version number has changed a lot, but functionality degraded almost to zero. Last time I touched Wine at version 0.9something. Something is always missing and something is always not working. I see other people reporting the same problems I do have as well.īut there is no solution. Why those aren't removed and hard dependency/options used instead? Wine has multiple USE flags and I usually tend to use as less as possible of them,īut wine became non functional at all if not using certain USE flags. Then winetricks still cannot find mono, but. I've made /usr/share/wine to be the soft link of versioned install. While wine itself installed to /usr/share/wine-vanilla-6.17/. I have installed wine-mono, which is recommended, but winetricks/wine cannot findīy some miracle wine-mono is installed into /usr/share/wine/. I've tried the latest 6.17 version of Wine and 6.0.1 which is marked as stable, but actually brokenĪs it is stated during the installation, because mono (.NET) and other components are notįunctional after 5.18 till 6.6 version of Wine which is NOT available in portage. Then I played with 32-bit only version of Wine. I had to move 64-bit only system to multilib, which I hate. At least it can't work w/o 32 counterpart. It seems like 64-bit Wine is not working at all. There are 2 versions of program of interest 32 and 64 bit. To use windows based program (ZWCAD if some one is interested) Posted: Fri 7:28 am Post subject: Is Wine dead? Gentoo Forums Forum Index Portage & Programming Gentoo Forums :: View topic - Is Wine dead?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |